开始:VCALENDAR版本:2.0 PRODID:-//劳动经济研究所//Zope//EN方法:发布CALSCALE:公历开始:VTIMEZONE TZID:欧洲/柏林开始:日光TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=每年;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=- 1su DTSTART:19810329T020000 TZNAME:CEST TZOFFSETTO:+0200结束:日光开始:标准TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 RRULE:FREQ=每年;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=- 1su DTSTART:19961027T030000 TZNAME:CET TZOFFSETTO:+0100结束:标准结束:VTIMEZONE开始:VEVENT UID:33771623103200@conference.iza.org描述:有证据表明，人们对谈判的普遍程度和谈判的预期效果有系统性的误解，基于这一证据，我们对波士顿大学2018年和2019年商学院本科毕业生进行了一项随机信息实验。具体来说，在大三结束时，也就是在找工作之前，研究人员向一部分人提供了有关性别谈判率相对差异的信息，以及以往毕业生所报告的谈判效率。比较治疗时关于谈判可能性的信息前和信息后的信念，我们发现信息增加了学生第一份工作中任何金钱方面的谈判可能性。虽然处理的重点是金钱方面，但这些信息似乎也推动了学生们就工作的非金钱方面进行谈判的意图，男性和女性都增加了他们就非金钱方面进行谈判的可能性。在对毕业后接受治疗的队列进行随访后，我们发现经济和统计上对实际劳动力市场结果有显著影响。处理方法:(1)提高了男女学生在第一份工作中协商非金钱方面的可能性;(2)与对照组的男性相比，接受治疗的男性在工作待遇方面进行谈判的可能性高出10%(50%)。令人惊讶的是，接受治疗的女性并不比对照组的女性更愿意谈判;然而，两组的谈判率都明显高于前一组的女性。 We present several pieces of evidence that suggest that this is due, in part, to gender-specific treatment spillovers; (3) weakly increased the likelihood that students � especially females � were satisfied with their current job. While our estimates for annual earnings are imprecise, point estimates suggest that the treatment group had a lower gender earnings gap compared to the previous cohort. Finally, our analysis suggests that the mechanism behind the observed treatment effects operates through modifying beliefs for females, and through a saliency channel for males. \n SEQUENCE:1 X-APPLE-TRAVEL-ADVISORY-BEHAVIOR:AUTOMATIC SUMMARY:IZA Seminar: Gender Differences in Negotiations and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from an Information Provision Experiment with College Students by Basit Zafar (University of Michigan) DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20210608T143000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:T154500 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR